From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing
 offloads
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:30:26 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <20171128.043026.1559245605707710598.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20171124023613.16855-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
        <20171124023613.16855-5-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
        jiri@resnulli.us
To: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:56824 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752874AbdK0Tac (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:30:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20171124023613.16855-5-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:36:11 -0800

> The dummy driver have previously been extended to test SR-IOV,
> but the general consensus seems to be against adding further
> features to it.

I guess this is fine, but then is it going to be the case that
every time we want to add a software offload implementation for
testing driver paths we add yet another dummy driver?