From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:20:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20171129152058.389361d3576e784f47326cac@linux-foundation.org> References: <1511921105-3647-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> <1511921105-3647-5-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Linus Torvalds , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , "Theodore Ts'o" , Kees Cook , Paolo Bonzini , Tycho Andersen , "Roberts, William C" , Tejun Heo , Jordan Glover , Greg KH , Petr Mladek , Joe Perches , Ian Campbell , Sergey Senozhatsky , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Chris Fries , Dave Weinstein To: "Tobin C. Harding" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1511921105-3647-5-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:05:04 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > printk specifier %p now hashes all addresses before printing. Sometimes > we need to see the actual unmodified address. This can be achieved using > %lx but then we face the risk that if in future we want to change the > way the Kernel handles printing of pointers we will have to grep through > the already existent 50 000 %lx call sites. Let's add specifier %px as a > clear, opt-in, way to print a pointer and maintain some level of > isolation from all the other hex integer output within the Kernel. > > Add printk specifier %px to print the actual unmodified address. > > ... > > +Unmodified Addresses > +==================== > + > +:: > + > + %px 01234567 or 0123456789abcdef > + > +For printing pointers when you _really_ want to print the address. Please > +consider whether or not you are leaking sensitive information about the > +Kernel layout in memory before printing pointers with %px. %px is > +functionally equivalent to %lx. %px is preferred to %lx because it is more > +uniquely grep'able. If, in the future, we need to modify the way the Kernel > +handles printing pointers it will be nice to be able to find the call > +sites. > + You might want to add a checkpatch rule which emits a stern do-you-really-want-to-do-this warning when someone uses %px.