From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio-net: help live migrate SR-IOV devices Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:14:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20171130161125-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20171128112722.00003716@intel.com> <0fb552d4-1bfc-e130-4fc1-87b83873916d@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jesse Brandeburg , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jakub Kicinski , Sridhar Samudrala , Achiad , Peter Waskiewicz Jr , "Singhai, Anjali" , Andy Gospodarek , Or Gerlitz , Hannes Frederic Sowa , netdev To: Jason Wang Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58092 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750885AbdK3OOl (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:14:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0fb552d4-1bfc-e130-4fc1-87b83873916d@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > If my understanding is correct there's no need to for any extension of > virtio spec. There appears to be a concern that some existing configurations might use same MAC for an unrelated reason. Not sure what that could be, but for sure, we could add a feature flag. That needs to be approved by the virtio TC, but it's just a single line in the spec no big deal, we can help here. > If this is true, maybe you can start to prepare the patch? Yes, please do. We can add a safeguard of a feature bit on top. -- MST