netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1'
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 04:54:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201045439.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201034859.GN21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:48:59AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Something similar to get_prog_path_type() above might make for a usable
> primitive, IMO...

Incidentally, bpf_obj_get_user()/bpf_obj_do_get() should just use
user_path(), rather than wanking with getname()+kern_path(pname->name)+putname().
Note that kern_path() will do getname_kernel() to get struct pathname...

Would cause problems for tracepoints in there, though.  And that, BTW,
is precisely why I don't want tracepoints in core VFS, TYVM - makes
restructuring the code harder...

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-01  0:57 netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1' Kees Cook
2017-12-01  1:33 ` Al Viro
2017-12-01  3:48   ` Al Viro
2017-12-01  4:54     ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-12-01 17:39       ` Al Viro
2017-12-01 20:47         ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-02 18:48           ` Al Viro
2017-12-02 22:08             ` Al Viro
2017-12-03  4:22               ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-04  9:57             ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]       ` <CA+55aFx4WEm5Feu7S8Z_73Gfsym6aBFpT3iGZXS5QyMQvgkWtA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-01 20:13         ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-01 21:34     ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171201045439.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).