From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sthemmin@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] allow setting gso_maximum values
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:40:02 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204.104002.1311507295275740357.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201153001.4170f55d@xeon-e3>
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:30:01 -0800
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:11:56 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
>> This is another way of addressing the GSO maximum performance issues for
>> containers on Azure. What happens is that the underlying infrastructure uses
>> a overlay network such that GSO packets over 64K - vlan header end up cause
>> either guest or host to have do expensive software copy and fragmentation.
>>
>> The netvsc driver reports GSO maximum settings correctly, the issue
>> is that containers on veth devices still have the larger settings.
>> One solution that was examined was propogating the values back
>> through the bridge device, but this does not work for cases where
>> virtual container network is done on L3.
>>
>> This patch set punts the problem to the orchestration layer that sets
>> up the container network. It also enables other virtual devices
>> to have configurable settings for GSO maximum.
>>
>> Stephen Hemminger (2):
>> rtnetlink: allow GSO maximums to be passed to device
>> veth: allow configuring GSO maximums
>>
>> drivers/net/veth.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>
> I would like a confirmation from Intel that is doing Docker testing
> that this works for them before merging.
Like David Ahern, I think you should allow this net netlink setting
during changelink as well as newlink.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 20:11 [PATCH net-next 0/2] allow setting gso_maximum values Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-01 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: allow GSO maximums to be passed to device Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-01 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] veth: allow configuring GSO maximums Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-04 2:43 ` David Ahern
2017-12-05 0:03 ` Cong Wang
2017-12-05 1:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-01 23:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] allow setting gso_maximum values Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-02 1:03 ` Solio Sarabia
2017-12-04 15:40 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204.104002.1311507295275740357.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).