From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7 v2] net: ethernet: i825xx: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:25:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20171204.132556.1601454745789376393.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1512409703-20881-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <1512409703-20881-5-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, michal.simek@xilinx.com, opendmb@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1512409703-20881-5-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Arvind Yadav Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:18:20 +0530 > @@ -120,9 +120,10 @@ static int sni_82596_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > netdevice->dev_addr[5] = readb(eth_addr + 0x06); > iounmap(eth_addr); > > - if (!netdevice->irq) { > + if (netdevice->irq <= 0) { > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ not found for i82596 at 0x%lx\n", > __FILE__, netdevice->base_addr); > + retval = netdevice->irq ? netdevice->irq : -ENODEV; > goto probe_failed; > } Ok, thinking about this some more... It is impossible to use platform_get_irq() without every single call site having this funny: ret = val ? val : -ENODEV; sequence. This is unnecessary duplication and it is also error prone, so I really think this logic belongs in platform_get_irq() itself. It can convert '0' to -ENODEV and that way we need no special logic in the callers at all.