From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: use per-port upstream port
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:47:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20171205.144727.522098543209254657.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20171204173457.14873-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch
To: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171204173457.14873-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Mon,  4 Dec 2017 12:34:52 -0500

> An upstream port is a local switch port used to reach a CPU port.
> 
> DSA still considers a unique CPU port in the whole switch fabric and
> thus return a unique upstream port for a given switch. This is wrong in
> a multiple CPU ports environment.
> 
> We are now switching to using the dedicated CPU port assigned to each
> port in order to get rid of the deprecated unique tree CPU port.
> 
> This patchset makes the dsa_upstream_port() helper take a port argument
> and goes one step closer complete support for multiple CPU ports.

Please adhere to reverse-christmas-tree for variable declarations in
these changes.

I know it can be a pain when there are inter-variable dependencies
wrt. assignments, but just move it below the declaration and into a
real statement.

Thanks.