From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in e1000e since Kernel 4.14.3
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:18:34 +0100
Message-ID: <20171205061834.GB1341@kroah.com>
References: <2d4f3853-a81d-d37d-6b1c-5b4416bcb91d@gmx.de>
 <a117fc7c-e65f-7bae-d266-877686af1870@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "rwarsow@gmx.de" <rwarsow@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a117fc7c-e65f-7bae-d266-877686af1870@gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
> On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote:
> 
> > Hallo
> > 
> > someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix.
> > 
> > 
> > bug report is here:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
> 
> ( added stable and netdev to CC )
> 
> Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3.

Again, can people try 4.14.5-rc1?  It should be resolved there.

thanks,

greg k-h