From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Regression in e1000e since Kernel 4.14.3 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:19:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20171205061920.GC1341@kroah.com> References: <2d4f3853-a81d-d37d-6b1c-5b4416bcb91d@gmx.de> <20171205061834.GB1341@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "rwarsow@gmx.de" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Gabriel C Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171205061834.GB1341@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:18:34AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote: > > On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@gmx.de wrote: > > > > > Hallo > > > > > > someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix. > > > > > > > > > bug report is here: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047 > > > > ( added stable and netdev to CC ) > > > > Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3. > > Again, can people try 4.14.5-rc1? It should be resolved there. Oops, that would be 4.14.4-rc1. Any why do you say above that is on the way without a fix, did you test it? thanks, greg k-h