From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bnxt_en: Use NETIF_F_GRO_HW.
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:10:52 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205181052.GD3327@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLi=nDh_xfwwa6jp-amKp21+9SdeUA4TcrVGGvmi8UKGv3A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> As already pointed out, GRO_HW is a subset of GRO. Packets that
> cannot be aggregated in hardware (due to hardware resource limitations
> or protocol types that it doesn't handle) can just be passed to the
> stack for GRO aggregation.
How would the parameters/limits work in this case? I mean, currently
we have the default weight of 64 packets per napi poll cycle, the
budget of 300 per cycle and also the time constrain,
net.core.netdev_budget_usecs.
With GRO_HW, this 64 limit may be exceeded. I'm looking at qede code
and it works by couting each completion as 1 rcv_pkts
(qede_fp.c:1318). So if it now gets 64 packets, it's up to 64*MTU
aprox, GRO'ed or not. But with GRO_HW, seems it may be much more than
that and which may not be fair with other interfaces in the system.
Drivers supporting GRO_HW probably should account for this.
And how can one control how much time a packet may spend on NIC queue
waiting to be GRO'ed? Does it use the coalescing parameters for that?
Marcelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 11:12 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Introduce NETIF_F_GRO_HW Michael Chan
2017-12-04 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: " Michael Chan
2017-12-04 16:30 ` Or Gerlitz
2017-12-04 16:47 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-12-04 18:23 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 18:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-12-04 18:59 ` David Miller
2017-12-04 19:24 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-12-04 19:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-04 19:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-12-04 19:52 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 20:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-12-04 23:05 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 22:15 ` Yuval Mintz
2017-12-04 22:31 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] bnxt_en: Use NETIF_F_GRO_HW Michael Chan
2017-12-04 16:35 ` Or Gerlitz
2017-12-04 18:11 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 21:06 ` Or Gerlitz
2017-12-04 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-05 0:07 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-05 18:10 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2017-12-06 21:04 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] bnx2x: " Michael Chan
2017-12-04 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] qede: " Michael Chan
2017-12-04 21:48 ` Yuval Mintz
2017-12-04 22:45 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-05 12:32 ` Chopra, Manish
2017-12-05 17:13 ` Michael Chan
2017-12-04 11:38 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] Introduce NETIF_F_GRO_HW Elior, Ariel
2017-12-05 19:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205181052.GD3327@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).