From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio-net: help live migrate SR-IOV devices Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20171205211603-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <0fb552d4-1bfc-e130-4fc1-87b83873916d@redhat.com> <20171130155612-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <780cf854-83e1-b2a4-0f07-74372a972ca6@oracle.com> <20171203065759-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20171203093524.26491cd0@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Duyck , Stephen Hemminger , Jakub Kicinski , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Sridhar Samudrala , netdev , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Achiad , Peter Waskiewicz Jr , "Singhai, Anjali" , Shannon Nelson , Andy Gospodarek , Or Gerlitz To: achiad shochat Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51184 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbdLETUM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:20:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote: > Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any > other PV device). > And we could handle the VF DMA dirt issue agnostically. For the record, I won't block patches adding this kist to virtio on the basis that they must be generic. It's not a lot of code, implementation can come first, prettify later. But we do need to have a discussion about how devices are paired. I am not sure using just MAC works. E.g. some passthrough devices don't give host ability to set the MAC. Are these worth worrying about? -- MST