From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: Transport mode xfrm_gro
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:06:20 +1100
Message-ID: <20171206040620.GA21142@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20171206033717.GA20920@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from [128.1.224.119] ([128.1.224.119]:43210 "EHLO ringil.hmeau.com"
        rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1754559AbdLFEGX (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:06:23 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171206033717.GA20920@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:37:17PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> So why is xfrm_input in the xfrm_gro case trying to reinject the
> skb into the network stack?

Nevermind, I see now that transport_finish has code to skip xfrm_gro
packets.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt