From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Few BPF doc updates Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:56:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20171206225654.c7ywi75l5okuke6b@ast-mbp> References: <20171206001241.17716-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ast@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:37340 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751989AbdLFW5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:57:04 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id y6so3034572pgp.4 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 14:57:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171206001241.17716-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:12:39AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Two changes, i) add BPF trees into maintainers file, and ii) add > a BPF doc around the development process, similarly as we have > with netdev FAQ, but just describing BPF specifics. Thanks! > > Daniel Borkmann (2): > bpf, doc: add bpf trees and tps to maintainers entry > bpf, doc: add faq about bpf development process > > Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.txt | 519 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 4 + > 2 files changed, 523 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.txt Applied to bpf-next, thanks Daniel!