From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ncardwell@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] TCP BBR sampling fixes for loss recovery undo
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:07:35 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171207.130735.1272656256907613869.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQymVKptA4ZFxfW2M5gHKfZspt_pp2NcWW1ryyaXtrrQeBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:48:40 -0500
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> wrote:
>> This patch series has a few minor bug fixes for cases where spurious
>> loss recoveries can trick BBR estimators into estimating that the
>> available bandwidth is much lower than the true available bandwidth.
>> In both cases the fix here is to just reset the estimator upon loss
>> recovery undo.
>>
>> Neal Cardwell (3):
>> tcp_bbr: record "full bw reached" decision in new full_bw_reached bit
>> tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on loss recovery undo
>> tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo
>>
>> net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Sorry, I should have mentioned these patches are all stable candidates
> and should have all carried a footer of:
>
> Fixes: 0f8782ea1497 ("tcp_bbr: add BBR congestion control")
>
> David, I can resend a v2 with that footer on each patch if you want.
It is not necessary to resend.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 17:43 [PATCH net 0/3] TCP BBR sampling fixes for loss recovery undo Neal Cardwell
2017-12-07 17:43 ` [PATCH net 1/3] tcp_bbr: record "full bw reached" decision in new full_bw_reached bit Neal Cardwell
2017-12-07 17:43 ` [PATCH net 2/3] tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on loss recovery undo Neal Cardwell
2017-12-07 17:43 ` [PATCH net 3/3] tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling " Neal Cardwell
2017-12-07 17:48 ` [PATCH net 0/3] TCP BBR sampling fixes for " Neal Cardwell
2017-12-07 18:07 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-12-08 18:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171207.130735.1272656256907613869.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).