From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: allow XAUI phy interface mode Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:35:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20171212083556.GN28672@lunn.ch> References: <20171211.135403.1074292653549923685.davem@davemloft.net> <20171211190220.GY10595@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:57832 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbdLLIgK (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:36:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171211190220.GY10595@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > That's something like it - asked Andrew via IRC on Saturday: > > Do we want to do the XAUI thing as one patch to avoid any breakage, and > if so via whom? Hi Russell Sorry for not replying. I was on a plane by then. > and haven't had a response. Normally arm-soc folk want patches > touching arch/arm/boot/dts to go via their tree. > > So, until I know what to do, I can't proceed with this... and I've > soo many outstanding net patches now that I'm losing track of where > each patch I've sent out is. Sorry, I'm failing. I would put both patches via netdev, to avoid breakage. We have done this before for the ZII devel board, with the imx maintainers ACK. I don't expect any clashes in the DT file. The 10Gb port might be added soon, but i think there is enough separation in the changes they won't result in a conflict if they take a different path. Do you want me to send a v2, with the additional DT patch? Thanks Andrew