From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives -
 ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:04:55 -0800
Message-ID: <20171213110455.144a955d@cakuba.netronome.com>
References: <20171212194532.GA7062@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
        <20171212120409.64b6362e@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
        <20171212155933.03c88eab@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20171213003659.GA21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
        <20171212170437.4b129e50@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20171213013056.GB21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
        <20171212173528.340cd002@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20171213015125.GC21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
        <20171212184400.13b27cf8@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20171213142212.GD21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171213142212.GD21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:22:12 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> IMO it's not worth the trouble; let's go with the check inside of
> static inline and accept that on clang builds it'll do nothing.

Ack, thanks for investigating!