From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: phy: add support to detect 100BASE-T1 capability
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:11:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213201110.GB932@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213173751.12722-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> 100BASE-T1 is the automotive ethernet standard 802.3bw-2015. Currently
> we don't detect any valid modes for PHYs, which only support this
> standard. Add support to detect the common 100Mbit full-duplex mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 2 ++
> include/uapi/linux/mii.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 67f25ac29025..8ef48b38d97b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1607,6 +1607,8 @@ int genphy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (val < 0)
> return val;
>
> + if (val & ESTATUS_100T1_FULL)
> + features |= SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
Hi Lucas
Why did you decide to do this, and not add a SUPPORTED_100baseT1?
Could a device support both 100-BASE-T and 100-BASE-T1? If at some
point we need to differentiate between them, it is going to be
hard. Especially since this is part of the kernel ABI.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 17:37 [PATCH 1/3] net: phy: add support to detect 100BASE-T1 capability Lucas Stach
2017-12-13 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: phy: select sensible mode for non-autoneg PHYs on startup Lucas Stach
2017-12-13 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: phy: sanitize autoneg in phy_start_aneg_priv Lucas Stach
2017-12-13 20:11 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2017-12-14 9:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: phy: add support to detect 100BASE-T1 capability Lucas Stach
2017-12-14 9:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-12-14 10:30 ` Lucas Stach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213201110.GB932@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).