netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: ast@fb.com
Cc: holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 3/5] bpf: guarantee r1 to be ctx in case of bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:07:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214200727.22230-4-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171214200727.22230-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>

Some JITs don't cache skb context on stack in prologue, so when
LD_ABS/IND is used and helper calls yield bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data()
as true, then they temporarily save/restore skb pointer. However,
the assumption that skb always has to be in r1 is a bit of a
gamble. Right now it turned out to be true for all helpers listed
in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(), but lets enforce that from verifier
side, so that we make this a guarantee and bail out if the func
proto is misconfigured in future helpers.

In case of BPF helper calls from cBPF, bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data()
is completely unrelevant here (since cBPF is context read-only) and
therefore always false.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d459357..e39b013 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1674,7 +1674,13 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* With LD_ABS/IND some JITs save/restore skb from r1. */
 	changes_data = bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(fn->func);
+	if (changes_data && fn->arg1_type != ARG_PTR_TO_CTX) {
+		verbose(env, "kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d: r1 != ctx\n",
+			func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	memset(&meta, 0, sizeof(meta));
 	meta.pkt_access = fn->pkt_access;
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-14 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-14 20:07 [PATCH bpf 0/5] Couple of BPF JIT fixes Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-14 20:07 ` [PATCH bpf 1/5] bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-09 14:20   ` Michael Holzheu
2017-12-14 20:07 ` [PATCH bpf 2/5] bpf, ppc64: " Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-14 20:07 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-12-14 20:07 ` [PATCH bpf 4/5] bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-14 20:07 ` [PATCH bpf 5/5] bpf: add test case for ld_abs and helper changing pkt data Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-15 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf 0/5] Couple of BPF JIT fixes Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171214200727.22230-4-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).