From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: offload: don't require rtnl for dev list manipulation
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:09:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220041006.25629-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220041006.25629-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
We only need to hold rtnl_lock() around ndo calls. The device
offload initialization doesn't require it. Neither will soon-
-to-come querying the offload info. Use struct rw_semaphore
because map offload will require sleeping with the semaphore
held for read.
Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
---
kernel/bpf/offload.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index 8455b89d1bbf..b88e5ebdc61d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -20,8 +20,12 @@
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
-/* protected by RTNL */
+/* Protects bpf_prog_offload_devs and offload members of all progs.
+ * RTNL lock cannot be taken when holding this lock.
+ */
+static struct rw_semaphore bpf_devs_lock;
static LIST_HEAD(bpf_prog_offload_devs);
int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
@@ -43,17 +47,21 @@ int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
offload->prog = prog;
init_waitqueue_head(&offload->verifier_done);
- rtnl_lock();
+ /* Our UNREGISTER notifier will grab bpf_devs_lock, so we are safe
+ * to assume the netdev doesn't get unregistered as long as we hold
+ * bpf_devs_lock.
+ */
+ down_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
offload->netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, attr->prog_ifindex);
if (!offload->netdev) {
- rtnl_unlock();
+ up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
kfree(offload);
return -EINVAL;
}
prog->aux->offload = offload;
list_add_tail(&offload->offloads, &bpf_prog_offload_devs);
- rtnl_unlock();
+ up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -126,7 +134,9 @@ void bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
wake_up(&offload->verifier_done);
rtnl_lock();
+ down_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(prog);
+ up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
rtnl_unlock();
kfree(offload);
@@ -181,11 +191,13 @@ static int bpf_offload_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
if (netdev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERING)
break;
+ down_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(offload, tmp, &bpf_prog_offload_devs,
offloads) {
if (offload->netdev == netdev)
__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog);
}
+ up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
break;
default:
break;
@@ -199,6 +211,7 @@ static struct notifier_block bpf_offload_notifier = {
static int __init bpf_offload_init(void)
{
+ init_rwsem(&bpf_devs_lock);
register_netdevice_notifier(&bpf_offload_notifier);
return 0;
}
--
2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 4:09 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf: offload: report device back to user space (take 2) Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:09 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2017-12-20 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: offload: don't require rtnl for dev list manipulation Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: offload: don't use prog->aux->offload as boolean Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: offload: allow netdev to disappear while verifier is running Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: offload: free prog->aux->offload when device disappears Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: offload: free program id " Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] bpf: offload: report device information for offloaded programs Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 10:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] tools: bpftool: " Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: test device info reporting for bound progs Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220041006.25629-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox