From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>, <scientist@fb.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:29:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220122921.62e10f33@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220201943.24440-1-guro@fb.com>
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:19:43 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Bpftool determines it's own version based on the kernel
> version, which is picked from the linux/version.h header.
>
> It's strange to use the version of the installed kernel
> headers, and makes much more sense to use the version
> of the actual source tree, where bpftool sources are.
>
> This patch adds $(srctree)/usr/include to the list
> of include files, which causes bpftool to use the version
> from the source tree.
>
> Example:
> before:
>
> $ bpftool version
> bpftool v4.14.6
>
> after:
> $ bpftool version
> bpftool v4.15.0
Thanks for the patch, this would indeed use some improvement.
How about we just run make to get the version like liblockdep does?
LIBLOCKDEP_VERSION=$(shell make --no-print-directory -sC ../../.. kernelversion)
probably s@../../..@$(srctree)@
$(srctree)/usr/include is not going to be there for out-of-source builds.
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> index 9c089cfa5f3f..6864d416c49e 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> @@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ CC = gcc
>
> CFLAGS += -O2
> CFLAGS += -W -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wshadow
> -CFLAGS += -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi -I$(srctree)/tools/include -I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf -I$(srctree)/kernel/bpf/
> +CFLAGS += -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ -I$(srctree)/tools/include/uapi
> +CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/include -I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf
> +CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/kernel/bpf/ -I$(srctree)/usr/include
> LIBS = -lelf -lbfd -lopcodes $(LIBBPF)
>
> INSTALL ?= install
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 20:19 [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:26 ` Yonghong Song
2017-12-20 20:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2017-12-20 20:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-21 12:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-21 17:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220122921.62e10f33@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scientist@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).