From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:33:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220143140.0a3dc7f1@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513644036-45230-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:36 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> +static int virtio_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> + unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct net_device *event_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> +
> + /* Skip our own events */
> + if (event_dev->netdev_ops == &virtnet_netdev)
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
I wonder how does this work WRT loop prevention. What if I have two
virtio devices with the same MAC, what is preventing them from claiming
each other? Is it only the check above (not sure what is "own" in
comment referring to)?
I'm worried the check above will not stop virtio from enslaving hyperv
interfaces and vice versa, potentially leading to a loop, no? There is
also the fact that it would be preferable to share the code between
paravirt drivers, to avoid duplicated bugs.
My suggestion during the previous discussion was to create a paravirt
bond device, which will explicitly tell the OS which interfaces to
bond, regardless of which driver they're using. Could be some form of
ACPI/FW driver too, I don't know enough about x86 FW to suggest
something fully fleshed :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 0:40 [RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available Sridhar Samudrala
2017-12-19 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 17:41 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2017-12-19 17:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 18:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-19 18:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 18:21 ` David Miller
2017-12-19 18:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 19:42 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2017-12-19 19:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 22:37 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2017-12-19 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-20 0:26 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2017-12-21 1:31 ` Siwei Liu
2017-12-21 2:16 ` Siwei Liu
2017-12-21 4:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-22 8:42 ` Siwei Liu
2017-12-19 18:20 ` David Miller
2017-12-20 10:51 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-12-20 22:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2017-12-21 0:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-21 0:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-21 0:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220143140.0a3dc7f1@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).