netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>, <scientist@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:53:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220205332.GA28352@castle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122921.62e10f33@cakuba.netronome.com>

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:29:21PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:19:43 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > Bpftool determines it's own version based on the kernel
> > version, which is picked from the linux/version.h header.
> > 
> > It's strange to use the version of the installed kernel
> > headers, and makes much more sense to use the version
> > of the actual source tree, where bpftool sources are.
> > 
> > This patch adds $(srctree)/usr/include to the list
> > of include files, which causes bpftool to use the version
> > from the source tree.
> > 
> > Example:
> > before:
> > 
> > $ bpftool version
> > bpftool v4.14.6
> > 
> > after:
> > $ bpftool version
> > bpftool v4.15.0
> 
> Thanks for the patch, this would indeed use some improvement.
> 
> How about we just run make to get the version like liblockdep does?
> 
> LIBLOCKDEP_VERSION=$(shell make --no-print-directory -sC ../../.. kernelversion)
> 
> probably s@../../..@$(srctree)@
> 
> $(srctree)/usr/include is not going to be there for out-of-source builds.

Hm, why it's better? It's not only about the kernel version,
IMO it's generally better to use includes from the source tree,
rather then system-wide installed kernel headers.

I've got about out-of-source builds, but do we support it in general?
How can I build bpftool outside of the kernel tree?
I've tried a bit, but failed.

Thank you!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-20 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-20 20:19 [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:26 ` Yonghong Song
2017-12-20 20:56   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 20:53   ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2017-12-20 21:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-21 12:07       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-21 17:34         ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171220205332.GA28352@castle \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scientist@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).