From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>, <scientist@fb.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:53:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220205332.GA28352@castle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220122921.62e10f33@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:29:21PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:19:43 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > Bpftool determines it's own version based on the kernel
> > version, which is picked from the linux/version.h header.
> >
> > It's strange to use the version of the installed kernel
> > headers, and makes much more sense to use the version
> > of the actual source tree, where bpftool sources are.
> >
> > This patch adds $(srctree)/usr/include to the list
> > of include files, which causes bpftool to use the version
> > from the source tree.
> >
> > Example:
> > before:
> >
> > $ bpftool version
> > bpftool v4.14.6
> >
> > after:
> > $ bpftool version
> > bpftool v4.15.0
>
> Thanks for the patch, this would indeed use some improvement.
>
> How about we just run make to get the version like liblockdep does?
>
> LIBLOCKDEP_VERSION=$(shell make --no-print-directory -sC ../../.. kernelversion)
>
> probably s@../../..@$(srctree)@
>
> $(srctree)/usr/include is not going to be there for out-of-source builds.
Hm, why it's better? It's not only about the kernel version,
IMO it's generally better to use includes from the source tree,
rather then system-wide installed kernel headers.
I've got about out-of-source builds, but do we support it in general?
How can I build bpftool outside of the kernel tree?
I've tried a bit, but failed.
Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 20:19 [RFC PATCH net-next] tools/bpftool: use version from the kernel source tree Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:26 ` Yonghong Song
2017-12-20 20:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-20 20:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-20 20:53 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2017-12-20 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-21 12:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-12-21 17:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220205332.GA28352@castle \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scientist@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).