From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] error-injection: Support fault injection framework Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:12:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20171227021255.sahkcpgyzohl5brs@ast-mbp> References: <151427438796.32561.4235654585430455286.stgit@devbox> <151427450538.32561.2776225740675148782.stgit@devbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Josef Bacik , rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, Josef Bacik , Akinobu Mita To: Masami Hiramatsu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <151427450538.32561.2776225740675148782.stgit@devbox> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 04:48:25PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Support in-kernel fault-injection framework via debugfs. > This allows you to inject a conditional error to specified > function using debugfs interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > --- > Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt | 5 + > kernel/Makefile | 1 > kernel/fail_function.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 + > 4 files changed, 185 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 kernel/fail_function.c > > diff --git a/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt b/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt > index 918972babcd8..6243a588dd71 100644 > --- a/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt > +++ b/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt > @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ o fail_mmc_request > injects MMC data errors on devices permitted by setting > debugfs entries under /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/fail_mmc_request > > +o fail_function > + > + injects error return on specific functions by setting debugfs entries > + under /sys/kernel/debug/fail_function. No boot option supported. I like it. Could you document it a bit better? In particular retval is configurable, but without an example no one will be able to figure out how to use it. I think you can drop RFC tag from the next version of these patches. Thanks!