netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] tracing/kprobe: bpf: Check error injectable event is on function entry
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:16:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171227231644.168abc0f@vmware.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03e0ebb7-0b2a-4235-3408-c0d59a1ba4c2@fb.com>

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 19:45:42 -0800
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> wrote:

> I don't think that's the case. My reading of current
> trace_kprobe_ftrace() -> arch_check_ftrace_location()
> is that it will not be true for old mcount case.

In the old mcount case, you can't use ftrace to return without calling
the function. That is, no modification of the return ip, unless you
created a trampoline that could handle arbitrary stack frames, and
remove them from the stack before returning back to the function.

> 
> As far as the rest of your arguments it very much puzzles me that
> you claim that this patch suppose to work based on historical
> reasoning whereas you did NOT test it.

I believe that Masami is saying that the modification of the IP from
kprobes has been very well tested. But I'm guessing that you still want
a test case for using kprobes in this particular instance. It's not the
implementation of modifying the IP that you are worried about, but the
implementation of BPF using it in this case. Right?

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-28  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-26  7:46 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Separate error injection table from kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-26  7:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] tracing/kprobe: bpf: Check error injectable event is on function entry Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27  1:57   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-27  5:56     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27 22:46       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-28  2:34         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-28  3:45           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-28  4:16             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-12-28  4:32               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-28  8:20                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-29  1:03                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-29  8:20                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-01-08  3:01                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-08 13:21                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-28  7:56             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-26  7:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction pointer with original one Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27  2:00   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-26  7:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] error-injection: Separate error-injection from kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27  2:07   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-26  7:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] error-injection: Support fault injection framework Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27  2:12   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-27  8:09     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-27 22:49       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-28  1:38         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-28  3:49           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-28  7:51             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-12-29  1:11               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-12-29  7:34                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-01-04 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Separate error injection table from kprobes Josef Bacik
2018-01-09  1:17   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171227231644.168abc0f@vmware.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).