From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: oss-drivers@netronome.com, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/9] bpf: offload: free prog->aux->offload when device disappears
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:39:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171228023911.4251-5-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171228023911.4251-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
All bpf offload operations should now be under bpf_devs_lock,
it's safe to free and clear the entire offload structure,
not only the netdev pointer.
__bpf_prog_offload_destroy() will no longer be called multiple
times.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/offload.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index 69ddc3899bab..3126e1a842e6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -70,12 +70,14 @@ int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
static int __bpf_offload_ndo(struct bpf_prog *prog, enum bpf_netdev_command cmd,
struct netdev_bpf *data)
{
- struct net_device *netdev = prog->aux->offload->netdev;
+ struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
+ struct net_device *netdev;
ASSERT_RTNL();
- if (!netdev)
+ if (!offload)
return -ENODEV;
+ netdev = offload->netdev;
if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -111,7 +113,7 @@ int bpf_prog_offload_verify_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
down_read(&bpf_devs_lock);
offload = env->prog->aux->offload;
- if (offload->netdev)
+ if (offload)
ret = offload->dev_ops->insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx);
up_read(&bpf_devs_lock);
@@ -123,31 +125,24 @@ static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
struct netdev_bpf data = {};
- /* Caution - if netdev is destroyed before the program, this function
- * will be called twice.
- */
-
data.offload.prog = prog;
if (offload->dev_state)
WARN_ON(__bpf_offload_ndo(prog, BPF_OFFLOAD_DESTROY, &data));
- offload->dev_state = false;
list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
- offload->netdev = NULL;
+ kfree(offload);
+ prog->aux->offload = NULL;
}
void bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
-
rtnl_lock();
down_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
- __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(prog);
+ if (prog->aux->offload)
+ __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(prog);
up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
rtnl_unlock();
-
- kfree(offload);
}
static int bpf_prog_offload_translate(struct bpf_prog *prog)
--
2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-28 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 2:39 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/9] bpf: offload: report device back to user space (take 2) Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/9] bpf: offload: don't require rtnl for dev list manipulation Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/9] bpf: offload: don't use prog->aux->offload as boolean Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/9] bpf: offload: allow netdev to disappear while verifier is running Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/9] bpf: offload: free program id when device disappears Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/9] nsfs: generalize ns_get_path() for path resolution with a task Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/9] bpf: offload: report device information for offloaded programs Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/9] tools: bpftool: " Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-28 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 9/9] selftests/bpf: test device info reporting for bound progs Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-31 16:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/9] bpf: offload: report device back to user space (take 2) Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171228023911.4251-5-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox