From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jon.maloy@ericsson.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mohan.krishna.ghanta.krishnamurthy@ericsson.com,
tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au, hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au,
canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au, ying.xue@windriver.com,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [net 1/1] tipc: fix problems with multipoint-to-point flow control
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:52:27 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102.215227.1836995198743909376.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514573282-4355-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:48:02 +0100
> In commit 04d7b574b245 ("tipc: add multipoint-to-point flow control") we
> introduced a protocol for preventing buffer overflow when many group
> members try to simultaneously send messages to the same receiving member.
>
> Stress test of this mechanism has revealed a couple of related bugs:
>
> - When the receiving member receives an advertisement REMIT message from
> one of the senders, it will sometimes prematurely activate a pending
> member and send it the remitted advertisement, although the upper
> limit for active senders has been reached. This leads to accumulation
> of illegal advertisements, and eventually to messages being dropped
> because of receive buffer overflow.
>
> - When the receiving member leaves REMITTED state while a received
> message is being read, we miss to look at the pending queue, to
> activate the oldest pending peer. This leads to some pending senders
> being starved out, and never getting the opportunity to profit from
> the remitted advertisement.
>
> We fix the former in the function tipc_group_proto_rcv() by returning
> directly from the function once it becomes clear that the remitting
> peer cannot leave REMITTED state at that point.
>
> We fix the latter in the function tipc_group_update_rcv_win() by looking
> up and activate the longest pending peer when it becomes clear that the
> remitting peer now can leave REMITTED state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Applied, thanks Jon.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-29 18:48 [net 1/1] tipc: fix problems with multipoint-to-point flow control Jon Maloy
2018-01-03 2:52 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102.215227.1836995198743909376.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au \
--cc=hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=mohan.krishna.ghanta.krishnamurthy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox