From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 00/10] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share
 filter block instances
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:51:52 -0800
Message-ID: <20180103155152.7e94a295@cakuba.netronome.com>
References: <20171223155436.9014-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
        <ad7dbefc-515a-2cdd-a55f-86e0d8cc587b@gmail.com>
        <20171224071956.GA1883@nanopsycho>
        <780a80d0-9384-ae34-4cab-3070b004b64e@gmail.com>
        <20171225102346.GB1885@nanopsycho>
        <20180102194944.GG2051@nanopsycho.orion>
        <e34c7581-b5a0-58c4-dde0-cf50497417f8@gmail.com>
        <20180103094025.GA2067@nanopsycho.orion>
        <d6cff5a4-b240-2a19-2af0-8b60de9f5435@gmail.com>
        <20180103172209.GD2067@nanopsycho.orion>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
        mlxsw@mellanox.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
        vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        michael.chan@broadcom.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com,
        saeedm@mellanox.com, matanb@mellanox.com, leonro@mellanox.com,
        idosch@mellanox.com, simon.horman@netronome.com,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com, john.hurley@netronome.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx3.wp.pl ([212.77.101.9]:38632 "EHLO mx3.wp.pl"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750913AbeACXwE (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:52:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180103172209.GD2067@nanopsycho.orion>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:22:09 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> However I don't agree about breaking the existing filter add and show
> and also imposibility to make not-shared block shared in the runtime
> before defining it first.

FWIW I would agree with David that allowing add on a shared block
modify filters on another interface can break existing users.  (No
opinion on dump and lifetime).