From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: syzbot <syzbot+367889b9c9e279219175@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in ppp_dev_uninit
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:15:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105181531.GA1374@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001a11c006da57e7ff0561edda2b@google.com>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:58:01PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 4.15.0-rc6-next-20180103+ #87 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> syzkaller221540/3462 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000709ea4fe>]
> ppp_dev_uninit+0x1be/0x390 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:1369
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000752caad5>] ppp_unit_register
> drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:981 [inline]
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000752caad5>]
> ppp_dev_configure+0x6a4/0xc40 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:1066
>
ppp_unit_register() acquires pn->all_ppp_mutex while calling
register_netdevice(). If register_netdevice() fails, it can call
ppp_dev_uninit() which then tries to lock pn->all_ppp_mutex again.
Maybe unlocking pn->all_ppp_mutex before register_netdevice() would be
enough, but that'd make the unit visible while the PPP device isn't yet
registered. I'm going to check if that can be a problem.
That's probably worth a test anyway.
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git master
-------- 8< --------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index d8e5747ff4e3..264d4af0bf69 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -1006,17 +1006,18 @@ static int ppp_unit_register(struct ppp *ppp, int unit, bool ifname_is_set)
if (!ifname_is_set)
snprintf(ppp->dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, "ppp%i", ppp->file.index);
+ mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
+
ret = register_netdevice(ppp->dev);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_unit;
atomic_inc(&ppp_unit_count);
- mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
-
return 0;
err_unit:
+ mutex_lock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
unit_put(&pn->units_idr, ppp->file.index);
err:
mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 6:58 possible deadlock in ppp_dev_uninit syzbot
2018-01-05 18:15 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2018-01-05 18:27 ` Guillaume Nault
2018-01-05 18:53 ` syzbot
2018-01-05 19:05 ` syzbot
2018-01-05 18:32 ` syzbot
2018-01-05 18:41 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105181531.GA1374@alphalink.fr \
--to=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=syzbot+367889b9c9e279219175@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).