From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Fix phy_modify() semantic difference fallout Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:10:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20180109141008.GD27447@lunn.ch> References: <1515496281-10988-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Russell King , "David S . Miller" , Florian Fainelli , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1515496281-10988-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:11:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > In case of success, the return values of (__)phy_write() and > (__)phy_modify() are not compatible: (__)phy_write() returns 0, while > (__)phy_modify() returns the old PHY register value. > > Apparently this change was catered for in drivers/net/phy/marvell.c, but > not in other source files. > > Hence genphy_restart_aneg() now returns 4416 instead zero, which is > considered an error: > > ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: failed to connect PHY > IP-Config: Failed to open eth0 > IP-Config: No network devices available > > Fix this by converting positive values to zero in all callers of > phy_modify(). > > Fixes: fea23fb591cce995 ("net: phy: convert read-modify-write to phy_modify()") > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > Alternatively, __phy_modify() could be changed to follow __phy_write() > semantics? Hi Geert, Russell I took a quick look at the uses of phy_modify(). I don't see any uses of the return code other than as an error indicator. So having it return 0 on success seems like a better fix. Andrew