From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH 4/7] bpf: sockmap sample, report bytes/sec Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:27:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20180109142753.4ec376b1@redhat.com> References: <20180108180302.13647.13866.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> <20180108180558.13647.13464.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: brouer@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: John Fastabend Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53067 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753144AbeAIN2A (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:28:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180108180558.13647.13464.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:05:58 -0800 John Fastabend wrote: > Report bytes/sec sent as well as total bytes. Useful to get rough > idea how different configurations and usage patterns perform with > sockmap. Why BYTES per second, and not BITS per sec? -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer