From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: Add support for non-equal-cost
 multipath
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:15:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20180110.151501.2071855954960334867.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180109144028.30133-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
        roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
        pch@ordbogen.com, jkbs@redhat.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
        mlxsw@mellanox.com
To: idosch@mellanox.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:54628 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751396AbeAJUPD (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:15:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180109144028.30133-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue,  9 Jan 2018 16:40:24 +0200

> This set aims to add support for IPv6 non-equal-cost multipath routes.
> The first three patches convert multipath selection to use the
> hash-threshold method (RFC 2992) instead of modulo-N. The same method is
> employed by the IPv4 routing code since commit 0e884c78ee19 ("ipv4: L3
> hash-based multipath").
> 
> Unlike modulo-N, with hash-threshold only the flows near the region
> boundaries are affected when a nexthop is added or removed. In addition,
> it allows us to easily add support for non-equal-cost multipath in the
> last patch by sizing the different regions according to the provided
> weights.

This looks great, series applied, thanks!