From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: Add support for non-equal-cost
 multipath
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:31:48 +0200
Message-ID: <20180110123148.GA21800@splinter>
References: <20180109144028.30133-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
 <0d3d86fe-01ff-27ff-57c0-33e04fb5da90@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
        nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, pch@ordbogen.com, jkbs@redhat.com,
        yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mlxsw@mellanox.com
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:34903 "EHLO
        out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965273AbeAJMbx (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:31:53 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0d3d86fe-01ff-27ff-57c0-33e04fb5da90@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:38:14PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Also, have you considered support for sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_policy?

No, but I'm not sure what you expect it control? Note that unlike IPv4,
we have the flow label in the IP header, which we use for the multipath
hash.