From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II support
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:35:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110223514.1e5030cd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515549082-4141-3-git-send-email-u9012063@gmail.com>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:51:22 -0800, William Tu wrote:
> - [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS] = { .len = sizeof(u32) },
> + [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTSV1] = { .len = sizeof(u32) },
> + [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS] = { .len = OVS_ATTR_NESTED,
> + .next = ovs_erspan_opt_lens },
Ouch. It's actually much worse than that, you're redefining the meaning of
the field. That's complete no-go.
> + case OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTSV1:
> + OVS_NLERR(log, "ERSPAN attribute %d is deprecated.",
> + type);
> + return -EINVAL;
As is this.
> @@ -906,8 +1017,8 @@ static int __ip_tun_to_nlattr(struct sk_buff *skb,
> vxlan_opt_to_nlattr(skb, tun_opts, swkey_tun_opts_len))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> else if (output->tun_flags & TUNNEL_ERSPAN_OPT &&
> - nla_put_be32(skb, OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS,
> - ((struct erspan_metadata *)tun_opts)->u.index))
> + erspan_opt_to_nlattr(skb, tun_opts,
> + swkey_tun_opts_len))
And this.
The existing field must continue to work in the same way as before. It must
be accepted and *returned* by the kernel. You may add an additional field
but the existing behavior must be 100% preserved, both uABI and uAPI wise.
Jiri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 1:51 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] net: erspan: add support for openvswitch William Tu
2018-01-10 1:51 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/2] net: erspan: use bitfield instead of mask and offset William Tu
2018-01-10 1:51 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II support William Tu
2018-01-10 21:29 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-10 21:35 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2018-01-10 22:02 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-11 16:34 ` William Tu
2018-01-12 8:27 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-12 18:39 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-12 19:22 ` William Tu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110223514.1e5030cd@redhat.com \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).