netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	ncardwell@google.com, soheil@google.com,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] tcp: avoid min-RTT overestimation from delayed ACKs
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:11:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117201101.14137-2-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117201101.14137-1-ycheng@google.com>

This patch avoids having TCP sender or congestion control
overestimate the min RTT by orders of magnitude. This happens when
all the samples in the windowed filter are one-packet transfer
like small request and health-check like chit-chat, which is farily
common for applications using persistent connections. This patch
tries to conservatively labels and skip RTT samples obtained from
this type of workload.

Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index ff71b18d9682..2c6797134553 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ int sysctl_tcp_max_orphans __read_mostly = NR_FILE;
 #define FLAG_SACK_RENEGING	0x2000 /* snd_una advanced to a sacked seq */
 #define FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT	0x4000 /* tcp_replace_ts_recent() */
 #define FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK	0x8000 /* do not call tcp_send_challenge_ack()	*/
+#define FLAG_ACK_MAYBE_DELAYED	0x10000 /* Likely a delayed ACK */
 
 #define FLAG_ACKED		(FLAG_DATA_ACKED|FLAG_SYN_ACKED)
 #define FLAG_NOT_DUP		(FLAG_DATA|FLAG_WIN_UPDATE|FLAG_ACKED)
@@ -2857,11 +2858,18 @@ static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, const u32 prior_snd_una,
 	*rexmit = REXMIT_LOST;
 }
 
-static void tcp_update_rtt_min(struct sock *sk, u32 rtt_us)
+static void tcp_update_rtt_min(struct sock *sk, u32 rtt_us, const int flag)
 {
 	u32 wlen = sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_min_rtt_wlen * HZ;
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 
+	if ((flag & FLAG_ACK_MAYBE_DELAYED) && rtt_us > tcp_min_rtt(tp)) {
+		/* If the remote keeps returning delayed ACKs, eventually
+		 * the min filter would pick it up and overestimate the
+		 * prop. delay when it expires. Skip suspected delayed ACKs.
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
 	minmax_running_min(&tp->rtt_min, wlen, tcp_jiffies32,
 			   rtt_us ? : jiffies_to_usecs(1));
 }
@@ -2901,7 +2909,7 @@ static bool tcp_ack_update_rtt(struct sock *sk, const int flag,
 	 * always taken together with ACK, SACK, or TS-opts. Any negative
 	 * values will be skipped with the seq_rtt_us < 0 check above.
 	 */
-	tcp_update_rtt_min(sk, ca_rtt_us);
+	tcp_update_rtt_min(sk, ca_rtt_us, flag);
 	tcp_rtt_estimator(sk, seq_rtt_us);
 	tcp_set_rto(sk);
 
@@ -3125,6 +3133,17 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, u32 prior_fack,
 	if (likely(first_ackt) && !(flag & FLAG_RETRANS_DATA_ACKED)) {
 		seq_rtt_us = tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, first_ackt);
 		ca_rtt_us = tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, last_ackt);
+
+		if (pkts_acked == 1 && last_in_flight < tp->mss_cache &&
+		    last_in_flight && !prior_sacked && fully_acked &&
+		    sack->rate->prior_delivered + 1 == tp->delivered &&
+		    !(flag & (FLAG_CA_ALERT | FLAG_SYN_ACKED))) {
+			/* Conservatively mark a delayed ACK. It's typically
+			 * from a lone runt packet over the round trip to
+			 * a receiver w/o out-of-order or CE events.
+			 */
+			flag |= FLAG_ACK_MAYBE_DELAYED;
+		}
 	}
 	if (sack->first_sackt) {
 		sack_rtt_us = tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, sack->first_sackt);
-- 
2.16.0.rc1.238.g530d649a79-goog

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-17 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17 20:10 [PATCH 0/2 net-next] tcp: do not use RTT from delayed ACKs for min-RTT Yuchung Cheng
2018-01-17 20:11 ` Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2018-01-17 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-next] tcp: avoid min RTT bloat by skipping RTT from delayed-ACK in BBR Yuchung Cheng
2018-01-19 20:39 ` [PATCH 0/2 net-next] tcp: do not use RTT from delayed ACKs for min-RTT David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180117201101.14137-2-ycheng@google.com \
    --to=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).