From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] bpf: add couple of test cases for signed extended imms
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 01:24:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180120002437.3528-4-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180120002437.3528-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a couple of test cases for interpreter and JIT that are
related to an issue we faced some time ago in Cilium [1],
which is fixed in LLVM with commit e53750e1e086 ("bpf: fix
bug on silently truncating 64-bit immediate").
Test cases were run-time checking kernel to behave as intended
which should also provide some guidance for current or new
JITs in case they should trip over this. Added for cBPF and
eBPF.
[1] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/2162
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index f369889..e3938e3 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6109,6 +6109,110 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ { ETH_HLEN, 42 } },
.fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop2,
},
+ /* Checking interpreter vs JIT wrt signed extended imms. */
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 1",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R1, 0xfefbbc12),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0xffff0000),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(R2, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, R2, R3),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R2, -17104896, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 2",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R1, 0xfefbbc12),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0xffff0000),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(R2, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, R2, R3),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R2, 0xfefb0000, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 3",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R1, 0xfefbbc12),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0xffff0000),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R4, 0xfefb0000),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(R2, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, R2, R3),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R2, R4, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 4",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, -17104896),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R1, -17104896, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 5",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0xfefb0000),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R1, 0xfefb0000, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 6",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x7efb0000),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R1, 0x7efb0000, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "JNE signed compare, test 7",
+ .u.insns = {
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0xffff0000),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_MISC | BPF_TAX, 0),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0xfefbbc12),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X, 0),
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, 0xfefb0000, 1, 0),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 1),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 2),
+ },
+ CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ {},
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ },
};
static struct net_device dev;
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-20 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-20 0:24 [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] BPF misc improvements Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/9] bpf, verifier: detect misconfigured mem,size argument pair Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] bpf: add csum_diff helper to xdp as well Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] bpf: add couple of test cases for div/mod by zero Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] bpf: restrict access to core bpf sysctls Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] bpf, x86: small optimization in alu ops with imm Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] bpf: add upper complexity limit to verifier log Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 0:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] bpf: move event_output to const_size_or_zero for xdp/skb as well Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-20 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] BPF misc improvements Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180120002437.3528-4-daniel@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).