From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, idosch@mellanox.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:00:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124030004.4016-4-dsahern@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124030004.4016-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
Similar to IPv4 allow routes to be added with the RTNH_F_ONLINK flag.
The onlink option requires a gateway and a nexthop device. Any unicast
gateway is allowed (including IPv4 mapped addresses and unresolved
ones) as long as the gateway is not a local address and if it resolves
it must match the given device.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 00acf0103037..842b2646f1c0 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -2470,6 +2470,58 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net,
return rt;
}
+static int ip6_route_onlink_check(struct fib6_config *cfg,
+ struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ u32 tbid;
+
+ if (!dev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device required for onlink");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device is not up");
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+ }
+
+ tbid = l3mdev_fib_table(dev) ? : RT_TABLE_MAIN;
+ if (cfg->fc_table && cfg->fc_table != tbid) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+ "Table id mismatch between given table and device");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ cfg->fc_table = tbid;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ip6_route_check_nh_onlink(struct net *net,
+ struct fib6_config *cfg,
+ struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ const struct in6_addr *gw_addr = &cfg->fc_gateway;
+ u32 flags = RTF_LOCAL | RTF_ANYCAST | RTF_REJECT;
+ struct rt6_info *grt;
+ int err;
+
+ err = 0;
+ grt = ip6_nh_lookup_table(net, cfg, gw_addr, 0);
+ if (grt) {
+ if (grt->rt6i_flags & flags || dev != grt->dst.dev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ip6_rt_put(grt);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int ip6_route_check_nh(struct net *net,
struct fib6_config *cfg,
struct net_device **_dev,
@@ -2571,6 +2623,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (cfg->fc_metric == 0)
cfg->fc_metric = IP6_RT_PRIO_USER;
+ if (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
+ err = ip6_route_onlink_check(cfg, dev, extack);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+ }
+
err = -ENOBUFS;
if (cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh &&
!(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE)) {
@@ -2731,7 +2789,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
goto out;
}
- err = ip6_route_check_nh(net, cfg, &dev, &idev);
+ if (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
+ err = ip6_route_check_nh_onlink(net, cfg, dev,
+ extack);
+ } else {
+ err = ip6_route_check_nh(net, cfg, &dev, &idev);
+ }
if (err)
goto out;
}
@@ -2767,6 +2830,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_LOCAL | RTF_ANYCAST)) &&
!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
rt->rt6i_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
+ rt->rt6i_nh_flags |= (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
rt->dst.dev = dev;
rt->rt6i_idev = idev;
rt->rt6i_table = table;
@@ -3836,6 +3900,8 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
if (rtm->rtm_flags & RTM_F_CLONED)
cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_CACHE;
+ cfg->fc_flags |= (rtm->rtm_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
+
cfg->fc_nlinfo.portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh = nlh;
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net = sock_net(skb->sk);
@@ -4241,6 +4307,7 @@ static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
goto nla_put_failure;
}
+ *flags |= (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_OFFLOAD)
*flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 3:00 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/ipv6: Add support for ONLINK flag David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/ipv6: Move gateway validation into helper David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/ipv6: Add flags arg to ip6_nh_lookup_table David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` David Ahern [this message]
2018-01-24 22:08 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag David Ahern
2018-01-24 22:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124030004.4016-4-dsahern@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).