From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH 1/3] net: add a UID to use for ULP socket assignment
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 07:52:16 -0800
Message-ID: <20180126155216.GA10323@davejwatson-mba>
References: <20180126002001.23004.45946.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
 <20180126002701.23004.70470.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:54090 "EHLO
        mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753268AbeAZPwn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:52:43 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180126002701.23004.70470.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/25/18 04:27 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> I did not however retest TLS with the small change to ULP layer.
> Mostly because I don't have a TLS setup. I plan/hope to get around
> to writing either a sample or preferably a selftest for this case
> as well (assuming I didn't miss one).

> @Dave Watson can you take a quick look to verify the changes are
> good on TLS ULP side.

Looks reasonable, and passes my test suite.  One comment below

Tested-by: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>

> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tcp.h  |    6 ++++++
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ulp.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  net/tls/tls_main.c |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ulp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ulp.c
> index 6bb9e14..8ef437d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ulp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ulp.c
> @@ -133,3 +157,22 @@ int tcp_set_ulp(struct sock *sk, const char *name)
>  	icsk->icsk_ulp_ops = ulp_ops;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int tcp_set_ulp_id(struct sock *sk, int ulp)
> +{
> +	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
> +	const struct tcp_ulp_ops *ulp_ops;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (icsk->icsk_ulp_ops)
> +		return -EEXIST;
> +
> +	ulp_ops = __tcp_ulp_lookup(ulp);
> +	if (!ulp_ops)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	err = ulp_ops->init(sk);
> +	if (!err)
> +		icsk->icsk_ulp_ops = ulp_ops;

Does this need module_put on error, similar to tcp_set_ulp?

> +	return err;
> +}