netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:33:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180126223348.11250-14-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126223348.11250-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>

Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new
test cases.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c                              |   8 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index e3938e3..4cd9ea9 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -2003,10 +2003,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ { 4, 0 }, { 5, 10 } }
 	},
 	{
-		"INT: DIV by zero",
+		/* This one doesn't go through verifier, but is just raw insn
+		 * as opposed to cBPF tests from here. Thus div by 0 tests are
+		 * done in test_verifier in BPF kselftests.
+		 */
+		"INT: DIV by -1",
 		.u.insns_int = {
 			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R6, R1),
-			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, -1),
 			BPF_LD_ABS(BPF_B, 3),
 			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R7),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 9e7075b..697bd83 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <sched.h>
+#include <limits.h>
 
 #include <sys/capability.h>
 #include <sys/resource.h>
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 2",
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"DIV64 by 0, zero check",
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 1",
@@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 2",
@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
-		.retval = 0,
+		.retval = 42,
 	},
 	{
 		"MOD64 by 0, zero check",
@@ -171,13 +172,245 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 42,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check ok, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 8,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 by 0, zero check, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check ok, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 2,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 by 0, zero check 1, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 2,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 by 0, zero check 2, cls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = -1,
+	},
+	/* Just make sure that JITs used udiv/umod as otherwise we get
+	 * an exception from INT_MIN/-1 overflow similarly as with div
+	 * by zero.
+	 */
+	{
+		"DIV32 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
 		.retval = 0,
 	},
 	{
+		"MOD32 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = INT_MIN,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN),
+			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, -1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = INT_MIN,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 overflow, check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 overflow, check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, -1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"xor32 zero extend check",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, 0xffff),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
 		"empty prog",
 		.insns = {
 		},
-		.errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -374,7 +607,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode c4",
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh32 on reg",
@@ -385,7 +618,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode cc",
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh64 on imm",
@@ -501,7 +734,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "BPF_CALL uses reserved",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 8d",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -691,7 +924,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_LD_IMM",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -709,7 +942,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, 0, 0, 0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode ff",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -718,7 +951,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, -1, -1, -1, -1),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode ff",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -7543,7 +7776,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			},
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields",
+		.errstr = "unknown opcode d7",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
@@ -8964,6 +9197,90 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.retval = 1,
 	},
 	{
+		"calls: div by 0 in subprog",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
+		"calls: multiple ret types in subprog 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
+	},
+	{
+		"calls: multiple ret types in subprog 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 64),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+		.fixup_map1 = { 16 },
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
+	},
+	{
 		"calls: overlapping caller/callee",
 		.insns = {
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 0),
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26 22:33 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] BPF improvements and fixes Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] bpf: xor of a/x in cbpf can be done in 32 bit alu Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-28 18:58   ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] bpf: xor of a/x in cbpf can be done Naveen N. Rao
2018-01-28 20:51     ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] bpf: improve dead code sanitizing Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf: make unknown opcode handling more robust Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] bpf: fix subprog verifier bypass by div/mod by 0 exception Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] bpf, x86_64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] bpf, arm64: " Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] bpf, s390x: " Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 14:33   ` Michael Holzheu
2018-01-29 15:52     ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] bpf, ppc64: " Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-28 18:52   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] bpf, sparc64: " Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] bpf, mips64: " Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:39   ` David Daney
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] bpf, mips64: remove unneeded zero check from div/mod with k Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:36   ` David Daney
2018-01-26 22:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] bpf, arm: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-26 22:33 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-01-27  0:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] BPF improvements and fixes Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180126223348.11250-14-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).