netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix null pointer deref in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:31:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131003111.3492-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)

syzkaller was able to generate the following XDP program ...

  (18) r0 = 0x0
  (61) r5 = *(u32 *)(r1 +12)
  (04) (u32) r0 += (u32) 0
  (95) exit

... and trigger a NULL pointer dereference in ___bpf_prog_run()
via bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() where this was attempted to run.

Reason is that recent xdp_rxq_info addition to XDP programs
updated all drivers, but not bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(), where
xdp_buff is set up. Thus when context rewriter does the deref
on the netdev it's NULL at runtime. Fix it by using xdp_rxq
from loopback dev. netif_get_rx_queue() helper can also be
reused in various other locations later on.

Fixes: 02dd3291b2f0 ("bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs")
Reported-by: syzbot+1eb094057b338eb1fc00@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
 [ Note: Needs to wait till Linus pulled Dave's net-next so
   the affected commit lands in bpf tree. ]

 include/linux/netdevice.h                   |  6 ++++++
 net/bpf/test_run.c                          |  4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index cd46d3d..9630f4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3228,6 +3228,12 @@ static inline int netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev,
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline struct netdev_rx_queue *
+netif_get_rx_queue(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq)
+{
+	return dev->_rx + rxq;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
 static inline unsigned int get_netdev_rx_queue_index(
 		struct netdev_rx_queue *queue)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index a86e668..47cd0b7 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 {
 	u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
 	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
+	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
 	struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
 	u32 retval, duration;
 	void *data;
@@ -165,6 +166,9 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	xdp.data_meta = xdp.data;
 	xdp.data_end = xdp.data + size;
 
+	rxqueue = netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
+	xdp.rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq;
+
 	retval = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &duration);
 	if (xdp.data != data + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN)
 		size = xdp.data_end - xdp.data;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 697bd83..c0f16e9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -7780,6 +7780,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
 	{
+		"XDP, using ifindex from netdev",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct xdp_md, ingress_ifindex)),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 1, 1),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+		.retval = 1,
+	},
+	{
 		"meta access, test1",
 		.insns = {
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-- 
2.9.5

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-31  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-31  0:31 Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-01-31  7:24 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix null pointer deref in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-01-31 10:42   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-31 11:26     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180131003111.3492-1-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).