From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: memcontrol: charge allocated memory after
 mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:16:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20180201.101655.1316424669256047119.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180125001911.15597-1-guro@fb.com>
        <20180125.120302.1117695034222616751.davem@davemloft.net>
        <20180131215401.GA8956@castle>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        tj@kernel.org
To: guro@fb.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180131215401.GA8956@castle>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:54:08 +0000

> So I really start thinking that reverting 9f1c2674b328
> ("net: memcontrol: defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()")
> and fixing the original issue differently might be easier
> and a proper way to go. Does it makes sense?

You'll need to work that out with Eric Dumazet who added the
change in question which you think we should revert.