From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 19:04:33 +0000
Message-ID: <20180202190426.GA15313@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
References: <20180202165754.8551-1-guro@fb.com>
 <1517594367.3715.130.camel@gmail.com>
 <20180202180624.GA11596@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
 <1517596744.3715.137.camel@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1517596744.3715.137.camel@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:39:04AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 18:06 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > 
> > Idk, how even we can hit it? And if so, what scary will happen?
> > 
> > If you prefer to have it there, I definitely can return it,
> > but I see no profit so far.
> 
> I was simply curious this was not mentioned in the changelog.
> 
> A revert is normally a true revert, modulo the changes needed by
> conflicts and possible changes.
> 
> I personally do not care of this BUG_ON(), I had not put it in the
> first place.

Technically it's not a true revert, but you're totally right.
Let me add a note to the commit description.

Are you ok with the rest?

Thanks!