netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	davem@davemloft.net, shmulik@metanetworks.com
Subject: Re: xfrm, ip tunnel: non released device reference upon device unregistration
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 21:19:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180206211946.217783da@jimi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206131509.GA14261@breakpoint.cc>

On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:15:09 +0100
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:

> Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> wrote:
> > I gave the patch a quick try, but still I get this:
> > 
> > unregister_netdevice: waiting for dummy1 to become free. Usage
> > count = 2  
> 
> Was that with Eyals setup or the bridge one I posted?
> 
> If it was Eyals setup, its possible the patch missed hookup
> to whatever tunnel infra is used (the setup I used has ipip tunnel,
> everything is ipv4).
> 

Thanks!

Indeed the setup I'm testing uses ip6_tunnel.
I have tested a fix in the spirit of the patch and it looks valid 
for ip6_tunnel as well.

It looks though that this change would need to be added to any tunnel
device using dst_cache (vxlan, geneve, gre, ...).

> Also, perhaps it would be best to not bother with checking the
> device in question at all and unconditionally put device reference
> of all the dst_caches.  With setups that have e.g. 1k devices going
> down per second (ppp dialin and the like) doing the full search for
> every notify event would be rather expensive.
> 

I'm wondering - non-xfrm dsts are already correctly invalidated,
so do you think it makes sense to invalidate caches for devices that
have no xfrm dsts? or maybe I didn't understand the suggestion?

Eyal.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-06 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-04 11:21 xfrm, ip tunnel: non released device reference upon device unregistration Eyal Birger
2018-02-04 13:32 ` Eyal Birger
2018-02-06  8:53 ` Steffen Klassert
2018-02-06 10:32   ` Florian Westphal
2018-02-06 10:42   ` Eyal Birger
2018-02-06 12:56 ` Florian Westphal
2018-02-06 13:09   ` Steffen Klassert
2018-02-06 13:15     ` Florian Westphal
2018-02-06 13:21       ` Steffen Klassert
2018-02-06 19:19       ` Eyal Birger [this message]
2018-02-11 15:46         ` Florian Westphal
2018-02-12 11:54           ` Eyal Birger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180206211946.217783da@jimi \
    --to=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik@metanetworks.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).