netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, idosch@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Add support for path selection using hash of 5-tuple
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:32:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180213123206.GA17908@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180213000602.12150-1-dsahern@gmail.com>

Hi David,

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:05:55PM -0800, David Ahern wrote:
> Hardware supports multipath selection using the standard L4 5-tuple
> instead of just L3 and the flow label. In addition, some network
> operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use the 5-tuple. To that end,
> add support to IPv6 for multipath hash policy similar to
> bf4e0a3db97eb ("net: ipv4: add support for ECMP hash policy choice").
> The default is still L3 which covers source and destination addresses
> along with flow label and IPv6 protocol.
> 
> A separate sysctl is added for IPv6, allowing IPv4 and IPv6 to use
> different algorithms if desired.
> 
> The first 2 patches modify the IPv4 variant so that at the end of the
> patch set the ipv4 and ipv6 implementations are direct parallels.
> 
> Patch 3 refactors the existing rt6_multipath_hash in preparation for
> adding the policy option.
> 
> Patch 4 renames the existing netevent to have IPv4 in the name so ipv4
> changes can be distinguished from IPv6 if the netevent handler cares.
> 
> Patch 5 adds the L4 hash support.
> 
> Patch 6 adds the hook for the netevent to the spectrum driver to update
> the ASIC.
> 
> Patch 7 removes no longer used code.

Thanks for working on this.

I've yet to review the patches, but I did test them. The good news is
that the offloaded path works as expected. Different flows (random UDP
destination port, zero flowlabel) are hashed to different nexthops. With
the default policy all the flows are hashed to the same nexthop.

However, it seems that the kernel isn't spreading the traffic as
expected and the same nexthop is always hit. I'll look into it later
this week when I have some more time.

Thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-13 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-13  0:05 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Add support for path selection using hash of 5-tuple David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:05 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/7] net/ipv4: Pass net to fib_multipath_hash instead of fib_info David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:05 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/7] net: Align ip_multipath_l3_keys and ip6_multipath_l3_keys David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:05 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/7] net/ipv6: Make rt6_multipath_hash similar to fib_multipath_hash David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:05 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/7] net: Rename NETEVENT_MULTIPATH_HASH_UPDATE David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:06 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/7] net/ipv6: Add support for path selection using hash of 5-tuple David Ahern
2018-02-13 20:31   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-02-13 20:35     ` David Ahern
2018-02-13 20:59       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-02-13 21:02         ` David Ahern
2018-02-13 21:21           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2018-02-21 16:22   ` Ido Schimmel
2018-02-21 17:54     ` David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:06 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 6/7] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for ipv6 hash policy update David Ahern
2018-02-13  0:06 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 7/7] net: Remove unused get_hash_from_flow functions David Ahern
2018-02-13 11:03 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Add support for path selection using hash of 5-tuple Or Gerlitz
2018-02-13 12:42   ` Ido Schimmel
2018-02-13 13:16     ` Or Gerlitz
2018-02-14 22:45       ` Or Gerlitz
2018-02-13 15:21     ` David Ahern
2018-02-14 22:45       ` Or Gerlitz
2018-02-14 22:56         ` David Ahern
2018-02-18 10:40           ` Or Gerlitz
2018-02-13 12:32 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180213123206.GA17908@splinter \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).