From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] net: add bpfilter Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:33:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20180216.173354.347842978561257782.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180216134023.15536-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> <20180216145727.GC32618@breakpoint.cc> <20180216161408.GA3776@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com To: fw@strlen.de Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:59982 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbeBPWd4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:33:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180216161408.GA3776@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Florian Westphal Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:14:08 +0100 > Any particular reason why translating iptables rather than nftables > (it should be possible to monitor the nftables changes that are > announced by kernel and act on those)? As Daniel said, iptables is by far the most deployed of the two technologies. Therefore it provides the largest environment for testing and coverage.