From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:60278 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752917AbeBSP2h (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:28:37 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:28:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20180219.102836.2008731968176865109.davem@davemloft.net>
To: fw@strlen.de
Cc: laforge@gnumonks.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] net: add bpfilter
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180219152023.GB23857@breakpoint.cc>
References: <20180219145314.GD6333@breakpoint.cc>
        <20180219.100753.1512094681484399569.davem@davemloft.net>
        <20180219152023.GB23857@breakpoint.cc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:20:23 +0100

> See my other mail, where I explained, in great detail, the problems
> of the xtables UAPI.

As the person who wrote the bpfilter UAPI parser for this, you don't
need to explain this to me.

But it's not going anywhere, and is used by millions upon millions of
users.