From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-queue] e1000e: Fix check_for_link return value with autoneg off.
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:12:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180220061200.17708-1-bpoirier@suse.com> (raw)
When autoneg is off, the .check_for_link callback functions clear the
get_link_status flag and systematically return a "pseudo-error". This means
that the link is not detected as up until the next execution of the
e1000_watchdog_task() 2 seconds later.
Fixes: 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
index 31277d3bb7dc..ff308b05d68c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static s32 e1000_check_for_copper_link_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
* we have already determined whether we have link or not.
*/
if (!mac->autoneg)
- return -E1000_ERR_CONFIG;
+ return 1;
/* Auto-Neg is enabled. Auto Speed Detection takes care
* of MAC speed/duplex configuration. So we only need to
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
index f457c5703d0c..db735644b312 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ s32 e1000e_check_for_copper_link(struct e1000_hw *hw)
* we have already determined whether we have link or not.
*/
if (!mac->autoneg)
- return -E1000_ERR_CONFIG;
+ return 1;
/* Auto-Neg is enabled. Auto Speed Detection takes care
* of MAC speed/duplex configuration. So we only need to
--
2.16.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 6:12 Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2018-02-21 1:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-queue] e1000e: Fix check_for_link return value with autoneg off Neftin, Sasha
2018-02-24 6:43 ` Brown, Aaron F
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180220061200.17708-1-bpoirier@suse.com \
--to=bpoirier@suse.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).