From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:49786 "EHLO mail.us.es"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751641AbeBTKyA (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Feb 2018 05:54:00 -0500
Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11])
        by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F765B7E6
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:53:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FBFC21BE
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:53:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:53:55 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        laforge@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] netfilter: nf_tables: add BPF-based jit
 infrastructure
Message-ID: <20180220105355.f5dd2y73qjzkhciu@salvia>
References: <20180219163706.5388-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
 <20180219163706.5388-4-pablo@netfilter.org>
 <20180219.135334.93041549091981531.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180219.135334.93041549091981531.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Hi David,

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 01:53:34PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> I'm very suprised that this is generating classical BPF filters.
>
> We have native eBPF and that is what anything generating new code
> should be using, rather than the 20+ year old CBPF.

I'm not the only one that likes 90s interfaces after all ;-)

I'll explore how to generate eBPF code in the next patchset version.

Thanks!