From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Roman Kapl <code@rkapl.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: report if filter is too large to dump
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:42:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221084240.GF4196@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b1e29d-fa15-feaf-6120-0e751550a128@rkapl.cz>
Hi Roman,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:38:52AM +0100, Roman Kapl wrote:
> On 02/21/2018 08:45 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Roman Kapl wrote:
> >> So far, if the filter was too large to fit in the allocated skb, the
> >> kernel did not return any error and stopped dumping. Modify the dumper
> >> so that it returns -EMSGSIZE when a filter fails to dump and it is the
> >> first filter in the skb. If we are not first, we will get a next chance
> >> with more room.
> >>
> >> I understand this is pretty near to being an API change, but the
> >> original design (silent truncation) can be considered a bug.
> >>
> >> Note: The error case can happen pretty easily if you create a filter
> >> with 32 actions and have 4kb pages. Also recent versions of iproute try
> >> to be clever with their buffer allocation size, which in turn leads to
> > I'm curious, what does it lead to? :)
> >
> > Thanks, Phil
>
> tc will dump all filters up to the big one, then it will stop silently.
> So it will seem as if you have less filters.
>
> The new behavior is the same, but tc will at leas print the EMSGSIZE
> error. It does not handle it in any other way.
I got that, yes. Though your commit message stops mid-sentence and I
wondered what the dynamic buffer allocation "in turn leads to".
Thanks, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 20:32 [PATCH v2] sched: report if filter is too large to dump Roman Kapl
2018-02-20 10:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-02-20 18:43 ` Cong Wang
2018-02-21 2:58 ` David Miller
2018-02-21 7:45 ` Phil Sutter
2018-02-21 8:38 ` Roman Kapl
2018-02-21 8:42 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2018-02-21 8:49 ` Roman Kapl
2018-02-21 15:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180221084240.GF4196@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=code@rkapl.cz \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).