From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:47122 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932623AbeBVOfW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:35:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:35:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20180222.093516.144747386298055475.davem@davemloft.net>
To: dvyukov@google.com
Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: syzcaller patch postings...
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+Ywzk8y1MUmrNsFjLSFTf8xgGiujnPSjwxF9c6eBVMyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180221.164732.52123327250032598.davem@davemloft.net>
        <1519288016.2583.4.camel@redhat.com>
        <CACT4Y+Ywzk8y1MUmrNsFjLSFTf8xgGiujnPSjwxF9c6eBVMyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:58:07 +0100

> Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list
> that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So if
> netdev wasn't in CC, it will not be added to CC.
> 
> I will go and fix it now.

I don't want syzbot to send the patch to netdev, even if it
was in the CC: list.

And again this goes for netfilter-devel and linux-wireless as
well.

There is no reason whatsoever for syzbot to ever post an already
posted patch back to the list again, even if it was on the CC:
list.

In fact netdev will be on that CC: list most of the time.