netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, maloneykernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: ignore background traffic in psock_fanout
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:48:02 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180223.124802.1669012463834833697.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180223165620.136975-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:56:20 -0500

> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> 
> The packet fanout test generates UDP traffic and reads this with
> a pair of packet sockets, testing the various fanout algorithms.
> 
> Avoid non-determinism from reading unrelated background traffic.
> Fanout decisions are made before unrelated packets can be dropped with
> a filter, so that is an insufficient strategy [*]. Run the packet
> socket tests in a network namespace, similar to msg_zerocopy.
> 
> It it still good practice to install a filter on a packet socket
> before accepting traffic. Because this is example code, demonstrate
> that pattern. Open the socket initially bound to no protocol, install
> a filter, and only then bind to ETH_P_IP.
> 
> Another source of non-determinism is hash collisions in FANOUT_HASH.
> The hash function used to select a socket in the fanout group includes
> the pseudorandom number hashrnd, which is not visible from userspace.
> To work around this, the test tries to find a pair of UDP source ports
> that do not collide. It gives up too soon (5 times, every 32 runs) and
> output is confusing. Increase tries to 20 and revise the error msg.
> 
> [*] another approach would be to add a third socket to the fanout
>     group and direct all unexpected traffic here. This is possible
>     only when reimplementing methods like RR or HASH alongside this
>     extra catch-all bucket, using the BPF fanout method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

Applied, thanks Willem.

Indeed, not being able to control hashrnd makes determinism in tests
like this quite difficult.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-23 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-23 16:56 [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: ignore background traffic in psock_fanout Willem de Bruijn
2018-02-23 17:48 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180223.124802.1669012463834833697.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=maloneykernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).